In a recent development that’s sparked heated debates across social media, Bollywood actor Sonu Sood, celebrated for both his cinematic roles and his heartfelt philanthropy, has publicly supported a Swiggy delivery person caught on CCTV stealing Nike sneakers from a customer’s home in Gurugram.
Known as a hero during the COVID-19 pandemic for his aid to migrants and daily wage earners, Sonu took to his X account to comment on the incident, suggesting the delivery person’s desperate need might have driven the act. “If Swiggy’s delivery boy stole a pair of shoes while delivering food at someone’s house. Don’t take any action against him. In fact buy him a new pair of shoes. He might be really in need. Be kind ❤️🙏,” he posted.
If Swiggy’s delivery boy stole a pair of shoes while delivering food at someone’s house. Don’t take any action against him. In fact buy him a new pair of shoes. He might be really in need. Be kind ❤️🙏
— sonu sood (@SonuSood) April 12, 2024
This stance, however, did not resonate well with the online community. Many netizens criticized the actor, arguing that his comments could potentially normalize theft. One user responded sharply, “So if I need anything, am I allowed to steal anything from anyone’s house? This is one of the weirdest posts I have ever read.” Another added, “In the name of philanthropy, please don’t normalise stealing goods.”
Agreed sir! We all must be kind and help someone who is in need.
— Vivek Naskar (@vivek_naskar) April 12, 2024
But, he needs to be called out. This should not be encouraged. If he gets away this time, won't he feel confident when he tries for the next time. I understand your gesture but what if he is a thief?
On the professional front, Sonu Sood is gearing up for his next big project, an action-packed thriller titled Fateh. Directed by and starring Sood himself, alongside Jacqueline Fernandez and Vijay Raaz, the film promises to be a riveting watch. “Aa Raha Hoon 🔥 #Fateh! Brace yourselves for the biggest action-packed thriller!” he teased on Instagram.
As this controversy unfolds, it underscores the complex interplay of ethics, empathy, and legality. What are your thoughts? Can compassion justify actions that are legally and morally questionable, or should the law apply uniformly to all?
